Follow Discord
Sweep 28 Sep 2026 · 18:16Z Build v2.1.284 505 read Stable v2.1.277 Latest v2.1.284 Next v2.1.284 Feeds RSS JSON llms.txt llms-full.txt Unofficial

Claude Code v2.1.284 ·

Thinking from another organisation is now described as kept, not removed

The warning about thinking from another organisation now says it is not deleted and comes back if you resume signed in to that organisation

You'll notice Improvements
JSON All of v2.1.284
You'll noticeTier: how much it should matter to you
2Useful: my rating, 1 to 5
2Signal: worth watching, 1 to 5
SessionsArea: what it touches
ImprovementsKind: in v2.1.284,
ImprovementsSection of the release
What

The warning shown when you resume a session holding Claude's thinking from a different organisation has been rewritten. It used to say Claude's earlier thinking would be removed. It now says Claude can't use it, that it isn't deleted, and that you can resume the session signed in to that organisation to use it again.

The warning still depends on the model supporting this check and on a server-side switch that is off unless turned on remotely. In readings taken before this release, that switch was on for this site's account and for an anonymous baseline.

Why

The earlier wording suggested the thinking was lost for good. The new wording says it can be recovered by signing in to the right organisation.

Read from
Feature flag
tengu_lexical_glade Off by default, switched on for this account

The shipped code defaults this off, and the flag server returned on for the one account this site reads on this version. That is the reading that makes the entry above worth a second look, and it still says nothing about your account.

This account: on · anonymous baseline: on · compiled default in v2.1.284: off

These values were read against a different version of Claude Code, so treat them as the nearest reading available instead of one taken on this release.

Read once, for one account on one subscription tier, against v2.1.284. It isn't a statement about your account. What a flag value here can and cannot tell you

How sure we are
Something disagreesSomething we can check disagrees with this entry, or the writer said they could not settle it.
The writer flagged doubtWhether Claude Code now actually keeps the thinking, or only the wording changed, is not settled.

See this entry in the whole of v2.1.284 →

Feedback