Background workers are spawned with a --name argument identifying them.
What's wrong with this entry?
The argv for spawning a background worker now includes --name with a worker name, alongside the existing agent and system-prompt forwarding. It is skipped when the parent process is being kept.
"--name"
Strings lifted out of the shipped bundle, so the claim above can be checked against them.
Related
Other releases about the same thing. Found by shared names or similar wording; neither means one caused the other.
-
v2.1.234
Background task notifications arrive inside a system-reminder
Both mention background task
-
v2.1.235
Several finished background tasks now report as one line
Both mention background task
-
v2.1.236
Background-task notices no longer look like user approval
Both mention background task