Or, for the Project Glasswing model with the same capabilities: changedmodels/fable-5-1/migration-guide
Nearest release: v2.1.269, published 3 hours after this site recorded the change. Shown because the two are within 24 hours of each other. Nothing here says the release caused the edit.
Recorded here
Lines+1added
Lines−1removed
From line
946
where the diff opens
First seen
1 Sep 2026
this site's first read of the page
Recorded edits35to this page, all time
The whole hunk
from line 946, old and new numbered
/
from line 946
946946
9479472. **Thinking blocks are preserved only for the model that produced them, or a newer one:** Every `thinking` block records which model produced it. Claude Fable 5.1 reads its own blocks and those from Claude Mythos 5.1, Claude Opus 5, Claude Fable 5, Claude Mythos 5, and earlier Claude models. A conversation moving onto `claude-fable-5-1` from any of those keeps its earlier reasoning. The condition is one-way: apart from Claude Mythos 5.1, none of those models can read Claude Fable 5.1's blocks.
948948
949 A conversation that ran on Claude Fable 5.1 can land on an older model through a router switch, a client-side retry, or a [classifier refusal fallback](https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/build-with-claude/refusals-and-fallback), including a [server-side fallback](https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/build-with-claude/refusals-and-fallback#server-side-fallback). The API removes the blocks that model can't read before it sees them, the request succeeds, and you aren't billed for the dropped input tokens. The target model re-plans without that reasoning, which can raise cost and latency on the first turn after the switch. To see what was dropped, send the `thinking-binding-controls-2026-08-01` [beta header](https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/api/beta-headers): responses then carry an `input_transformations` array naming each dropped block with `reason: "model_binding_mismatch"`. See [Preserved thinking](https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/build-with-claude/thinking#preserved-for-model).
949 A conversation that ran on Claude Fable 5.1 can land on an older model through a router switch, a client-side retry, or a [classifier refusal fallback](https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/build-with-claude/refusals-and-fallback), including a [server-side fallback](https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/build-with-claude/refusals-and-fallback#server-side-fallback). The API removes the blocks that model can't read before it sees them, the request succeeds, and you aren't billed for the dropped input tokens. The target model re-plans without that reasoning, which can raise cost and latency on the first turn after the switch. To see what was dropped, send the `thinking-binding-controls-2026-08-01` [beta header](https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/api/beta-headers): responses then carry an `input_transformations` array naming each dropped block with `reason: "model_binding_mismatch"`. See [Switching models mid-conversation](https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/build-with-claude/preserved-thinking#switching-models).
950950
9519513. **Editing earlier turns invalidates thinking blocks:** Each `thinking` block from Claude Fable 5.1 is valid only against the `system` prompt, `tools`, and conversation history that preceded it. If Claude Code, claude.ai, [Claude Managed Agents](https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/managed-agents/overview), or the [Claude Agent SDK](https://code.claude.com/docs/en/agent-sdk/overview) manages your conversation history, it already keeps that prefix intact. If your code builds the `messages` array itself, this item applies to you, and [Preserved thinking](https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/build-with-claude/preserved-thinking) is the full integration guide. Where the check is enforced, a request that sends the block back after any of those changed is rejected with a 400 error:
952952
No line in this hunk matches that.