The Ulam spiral: are the primes' diagonal streaks real? changedclaude-science/example-gallery/math-ulam
Nearest release: v2.1.302, published under an hour after upstream edited the page. Shown because the two are within 24 hours of each other. Nothing here says the release caused the edit.
Upstream edited this page at 16 Oct 2026 16:02 UTC, give or take a minute or two: the time comes from Anthropic’s own sitemap rather than from a commit. This site recorded the change at 20 Oct 2026 18:07 UTC.
Upstream edited
Recorded here
Lines+1added
Lines−7removed
From line
2
where the diff opens
First seen
16 Oct 2026
this site's first read of the page
Recorded edits2to this page, all time
The whole hunk
from line 2, old and new numbered
/
from line 2
22
33> Compare the share of primes per diagonal on Ulam's 1963 spiral of 1 to 40,401 against as many random odd numbers.
44
5<div className="example-gallery-page">
6 <Frame>
7 <img className="block dark:hidden" src="https://mintcdn.com/claude-ai/F2QP9ubtYgT0edFI/images/claude-science/example-gallery/math-ulam-full-light.webp?fit=max&auto=format&n=F2QP9ubtYgT0edFI&q=85&s=140ca573e05d853818df9ab149c1f064" alt="Primes up to 40,401 on Ulam's spiral, with primes of n² + n + 41 in orange along 2 rays; as many random odd numbers, with no streaks; and histograms of each diagonal's share, wider for the primes." width="1600" height="632" data-path="images/claude-science/example-gallery/math-ulam-full-light.webp" />
8
9 <img className="hidden dark:block" src="https://mintcdn.com/claude-ai/F2QP9ubtYgT0edFI/images/claude-science/example-gallery/math-ulam-full-dark.webp?fit=max&auto=format&n=F2QP9ubtYgT0edFI&q=85&s=fac8550c8919a1486851d6287563661b" alt="Primes up to 40,401 on Ulam's spiral, with primes of n² + n + 41 in orange along 2 rays; as many random odd numbers, with no streaks; and histograms of each diagonal's share, wider for the primes." width="1600" height="632" data-path="images/claude-science/example-gallery/math-ulam-full-dark.webp" />
10 </Frame>
11</div>
5
126
137The numbers in your session might differ from this picture and from the summary in [Reference analysis](#reference-analysis).
148
No line in this hunk matches that.