Follow Discord
Sweep 03 Nov 2026 · 22:27Z Build v2.1.318 536 read Stable v2.1.311 Latest v2.1.318 Next v2.1.318 Feeds RSS JSON llms.txt llms-full.txt Unofficial

Claude Code v2.1.317 ·

A second remote switch now shares an existing switch's check

Claude Code now checks two remote switches the same way, and both are treated as on when the server sends nothing

Under the hood Internal Changes
JSON All of v2.1.317
Under the hoodTier: how much it should matter to you
1Useful: my rating, 1 to 5
2Signal: worth watching, 1 to 5
InternalsArea: what it touches
Internal ChangesKind: in v2.1.317,
Internal ChangesSection of the release

Unclear What either switch controls is not stated.

What

Claude Code now checks two remote switches, tengu_foamy_heron and tengu_deep_locket, the same way. Both are treated as on when the server sends nothing.

Why

The second switch, tengu_deep_locket, did not exist before and follows the same rules as the first.

Read from
Feature flag
tengu_foamy_heron Not enough to say

Nothing here resolved what this flag was doing on this version, so nothing here should be read as on or off.

This account: no value returned · anonymous baseline: no value returned · compiled default in v2.1.317: not a boolean we can read

These values were read against a different version of Claude Code, so treat them as the nearest reading available instead of one taken on this release.

Read once, for one account on one subscription tier, against v2.1.317. It isn't a statement about your account. What a flag value here can and cannot tell you

How sure we are
Something disagreesSomething we can check disagrees with this entry, or the writer said they could not settle it.
The writer flagged doubtWhat either switch controls is not stated.

See this entry in the whole of v2.1.317 →

Feedback