Follow Discord
Sweep 03 Nov 2026 · 22:27Z Build v2.1.318 536 read Stable v2.1.311 Latest v2.1.318 Next v2.1.318 Feeds RSS JSON llms.txt llms-full.txt Unofficial

Claude Code v2.1.317 ·

Sandbox stops following some symlinks in write-protected paths

Behind a server switch, the sandbox no longer follows a write-protected symlink that points at another host or cannot be safely checked

You'll notice Improvements
JSON All of v2.1.317
You'll noticeTier: how much it should matter to you
1Useful: my rating, 1 to 5
3Signal: worth watching, 1 to 5
SandboxArea: what it touches
ImprovementsKind: in v2.1.317,
ImprovementsSection of the release

Unclear What this switch does when the server sends nothing is not settled, so it is unclear whether the new handling applies to you by default.

What

In the sandbox, denyWrite lists places commands may not write to. A symlink is a file that points at another location. Before, the sandbox always followed a symlink in that list, up to 8 hops, and protected wherever it ended up. Behind a server-controlled switch, it now handles them differently:

  • A symlink that points at another host, or that cannot be checked without following it, is not followed. The sandbox logs this and keeps protecting the symlink's own path.
  • Symlinks that have been replaced get a new decision: follow, keep or refuse.
  • Symlinks that point at nothing are also handled differently.
Why

This closes a way of redirecting a write-protection rule to somewhere else by changing where a symlink points.

Read from
Names in the bundledenyWrite
How sure we are
Something disagreesSomething we can check disagrees with this entry, or the writer said they could not settle it.
The writer flagged doubtWhat this switch does when the server sends nothing is not settled, so it is unclear whether the new handling applies to you by default.

See this entry in the whole of v2.1.317 →

Feedback