Follow Discord
Sweep 27 Oct 2026 · 19:04Z Build v2.1.312 531 read Stable v2.1.308 Latest v2.1.312 Next v2.1.312 Feeds RSS JSON llms.txt llms-full.txt Unofficial

Claude Code v2.1.312 ·

Resuming an interrupted turn no longer depends on a server switch for one check

One part of the check that decides whether an interrupted turn can be resumed no longer consults a server-side switch

Under the hood Internal Changes
JSON All of v2.1.312
Under the hoodTier: how much it should matter to you
1Useful: my rating, 1 to 5
2Signal: worth watching, 1 to 5
SessionsArea: what it touches
Internal ChangesKind: in v2.1.312,
Internal ChangesSection of the release

Unclear It is not clear which part of resuming an interrupted turn the removed switch controlled.

What

When you resume a session whose last turn was interrupted, Claude Code runs several checks to decide how to treat that turn. One of those checks also used to ask a server-side switch, a setting Anthropic can turn on or off remotely, before it could pass. That switch is no longer consulted. The check now depends only on what the session's messages contain.

In the previous release, that switch was on by default when the server sent nothing.

Why

The switch appears to have been retired. Whichever sessions this check covers now follow the same path every time, rather than one Anthropic could change remotely.

Read from
Feature flag
tengu_vast_journal Not enough to say

Nothing here resolved what this flag was doing on this version, so nothing here should be read as on or off.

This account: no value returned · anonymous baseline: no value returned · compiled default in v2.1.312: not a boolean we can read

These values were read against a different version of Claude Code, so treat them as the nearest reading available instead of one taken on this release.

Read once, for one account on one subscription tier, against v2.1.312. It isn't a statement about your account. What a flag value here can and cannot tell you

How sure we are
Something disagreesSomething we can check disagrees with this entry, or the writer said they could not settle it.
The writer flagged doubtIt is not clear which part of resuming an interrupted turn the removed switch controlled.

See this entry in the whole of v2.1.312 →

Feedback