Follow Discord
Sweep 22 Oct 2026 · 04:32Z Build v2.1.308 527 read Stable v2.1.308 Latest v2.1.308 Next v2.1.308 Feeds RSS JSON llms.txt llms-full.txt Unofficial

Claude Code v2.1.307 ·

Usage data is now sent for permission decisions

Claude Code now sends usage data about each permission decision, recording what kind of rule or check made it

Under the hood Internal Changes
JSON All of v2.1.307
Under the hoodTier: how much it should matter to you
2Useful: my rating, 1 to 5
3Signal: worth watching, 1 to 5
TelemetryArea: what it touches
Internal ChangesKind: in v2.1.307,
Internal ChangesSection of the release
What

Claude Code decides, for each tool Claude wants to use, whether to allow it, and sometimes asks you. It now sends a usage report, called telemetry, about each of those decisions. The report says what kind of tool it was, how many times the sandbox was broken (the sandbox is a walled-off space that limits what commands can reach) and what made the decision:

  • a safety check
  • a managed policy
  • a permission rule
  • analysis of the command
  • a hook, a script you set up to run at certain moments
  • auto mode blocking it
  • auto mode giving no verdict
  • the permission mode
  • a sandbox override

It also reports when a hook pushes back after a tool has run. A remote switch, tengu_snoopy_creek, appears to control this, and it falls back to on when the server sends nothing.

Why

This is a new stream of usage data sent on every permission decision.

Read from
Feature flag
tengu_snoopy_creek Not enough to say

Nothing here resolved what this flag was doing on this version, so nothing here should be read as on or off.

This account: no value returned · anonymous baseline: no value returned · compiled default in v2.1.307: on

These values were read against a different version of Claude Code, so treat them as the nearest reading available instead of one taken on this release.

Read once, for one account on one subscription tier, against v2.1.307. It isn't a statement about your account. What a flag value here can and cannot tell you

How sure we are
One source agreesOne thing we can check says the same as this entry.
The name it cites is new in this buildNew in this build: tengu_snoopy_creek

See this entry in the whole of v2.1.307 →

Feedback