Unclear What marking a routine run as tainted changes for the user is not stated.
What
When a routine publishes an artifact for the first time without being asked to, Claude Code now records it. The outcome decides what happens next:
- owner-only, or refused before sending: nothing further
- any other known outcome: the run is marked as tainted
- an unknown outcome: the run is marked and an error is logged saying the publish was not owner-only
Why
This looks like a guard on routines sharing artifacts with people other than their owner.
Something disagreesSomething we can check disagrees with this entry, or the writer said they could not settle it.
The writer flagged doubt
What marking a routine run as tainted changes for the user is not stated.