Follow Discord
Sweep 29 Sep 2026 · 18:10Z Build v2.1.285 506 read Stable v2.1.280 Latest v2.1.285 Next v2.1.285 Feeds RSS JSON llms.txt llms-full.txt Unofficial

Claude Code v2.1.285 ·

Fewer shell permission refusals for NAME=value arguments after some commands

Some allowed shell commands followed by a NAME=value argument no longer fail the permission check as an unsafe variable setting

You'll notice Improvements
JSON All of v2.1.285
You'll noticeTier: how much it should matter to you
2Useful: my rating, 1 to 5
2Signal: worth watching, 1 to 5
PermissionsArea: what it touches
ImprovementsKind: in v2.1.285,
ImprovementsSection of the release
What

Before Claude Code runs a shell command, it checks whether the command is safe to run without asking you. One thing it looks for is text of the form NAME=value, which can set an environment variable. Environment variables are named settings that programs read. Before, any NAME=value whose name was not on a known-safe list made the check fail.

Now a NAME=value that comes after the command word of certain allowed commands is no longer treated as an unsafe variable setting, as long as the name fits a set pattern. This sits behind a remote switch, and the code falls back to on when the server sends no value.

Why

Commands such as cmd KEY=val should lead to fewer permission prompts or fallbacks.

Read from
Feature flag
tengu_quiet_larkspur Not enough to say

Nothing here resolved what this flag was doing on this version, so nothing here should be read as on or off.

This account: no value returned · anonymous baseline: no value returned · compiled default in v2.1.285: on

These values were read against a different version of Claude Code, so treat them as the nearest reading available instead of one taken on this release.

Read once, for one account on one subscription tier, against v2.1.285. It isn't a statement about your account. What a flag value here can and cannot tell you

How sure we are
Something disagreesSomething we can check disagrees with this entry, or the writer said they could not settle it.
The writer flagged doubtWhich commands this covers and which names the pattern accepts are not known.
The name it cites is new in this buildNew in this build: tengu_quiet_larkspur

See this entry in the whole of v2.1.285 →

Feedback