Follow Discord
Sweep 29 Sep 2026 · 18:10Z Build v2.1.285 506 read Stable v2.1.280 Latest v2.1.285 Next v2.1.285 Feeds RSS JSON llms.txt llms-full.txt Unofficial

Claude Code v2.1.285 ·

New check for when organization policy blocks remote control

Claude Code now treats remote control as blocked by organization policy only when the denial is final and the policy disallows it with markers present

Under the hood Internal Changes
JSON All of v2.1.285
Under the hoodTier: how much it should matter to you
2Useful: my rating, 1 to 5
3Signal: worth watching, 1 to 5
Remote ControlArea: what it touches
Internal ChangesKind: in v2.1.285,
Internal ChangesSection of the release
What

Claude Code now has a check that decides whether your organization's policy blocks remote control. It answers yes only when all of these hold:

  • the policy's verdict is "denied"
  • the denial is authoritative, meaning final
  • the allow_remote_control policy does not allow remote control while the session carries certain markers, which the code calls taints
Why

This narrows when remote control counts as blocked by policy. It ties the block to these markers rather than to a denial alone.

Read from
Feature flag
tengu_org_policy_denied Not enough to say

Nothing here resolved what this flag was doing on this version, so nothing here should be read as on or off.

This account: no value returned · anonymous baseline: no value returned · compiled default in v2.1.285: not a boolean we can read

These values were read against a different version of Claude Code, so treat them as the nearest reading available instead of one taken on this release.

Read once, for one account on one subscription tier, against v2.1.285. It isn't a statement about your account. What a flag value here can and cannot tell you

How sure we are
Something disagreesSomething we can check disagrees with this entry, or the writer said they could not settle it.
The writer flagged doubtWhat uses this check, what the markers are, and whether an oddly valued remote default nearby is related is not clear.

See this entry in the whole of v2.1.285 →

Feedback