Follow Discord
Sweep 25 Sep 2026 · 19:33Z Build v2.1.283 504 read Stable v2.1.274 Latest v2.1.283 Next v2.1.283 Feeds RSS JSON llms.txt llms-full.txt Unofficial

Claude Code v2.1.283 ·

MCP servers on older Java SDKs now connect after one automatic retry

If a Java MCP SDK 0.17.0-or-older server rejects Claude Code's elicitation support, Claude Code reconnects once without the parts it rejects

You'll notice Bug Fixes
JSON All of v2.1.283
You'll noticeTier: how much it should matter to you
3Useful: my rating, 1 to 5
1Signal: worth watching, 1 to 5
MCPArea: what it touches
Bug FixesKind: in v2.1.283,
Bug FixesSection of the release
What

MCP servers are add-on programs that give Claude Code extra tools. When connecting, Claude Code tells the server it supports elicitation, a way for the server to ask you for input, including by form or by link. Servers built on Java MCP SDK 0.17.0 or older reject the form and link parts and refuse to connect.

Claude Code now recognises that rejection and reconnects once without advertising form and link elicitation. Previously the connection simply failed. This applies only when Claude Code was advertising link (URL) elicitation.

If the connection still fails in a way that matches those older SDKs, the error is replaced with advice: set "bareElicitationCapability": true for that server, or upgrade to Java MCP SDK 0.17.1 or later (Spring AI 1.0.7+ or 1.1.6+).

Why

MCP servers built with older Java MCP SDK or Spring AI versions used to fail to connect at all. Most should now connect without any change on your side.

Read from
Feature flag
tengu_mcp_url_elicitation Not enough to say

Nothing here resolved what this flag was doing on this version, so nothing here should be read as on or off.

This account: no value returned · anonymous baseline: no value returned · compiled default in v2.1.283: on

These values were read against a different version of Claude Code, so treat them as the nearest reading available instead of one taken on this release.

Read once, for one account on one subscription tier, against v2.1.283. It isn't a statement about your account. What a flag value here can and cannot tell you

How sure we are
Something disagreesSomething we can check disagrees with this entry, or the writer said they could not settle it.
The writer flagged doubtIt is not confirmed that the retry removes exactly the form and link parts, or whether the advice text is shown to users in every case.

See this entry in the whole of v2.1.283 →

Feedback