Sweep 19 Sep 2026 · 02:36Z Build v2.1.278 500 read Stable v2.1.267 Latest v2.1.278 Next v2.1.278 Feeds RSS JSON llms.txt Unofficial
Claude Code v2.1.274 ·

Elevated device-bind tier request with retry-on-rejection

Session device-binding can now request an elevated security tier, retrying without it if the server rejects the request

TierNothing to try yethow much it should matter to you
Useful2my rating, 1 to 5
Signal3worth watching, 1 to 5
AreaDevice Securitywhat it touches
KindIn Developmentin v2.1.274,
Nothing to try yet No documentation found

Session device-binding can now request an elevated security tier, retrying without it if the server rejects the request

What

When creating a device-bound session, Claude Code can now ask the server for an 'elevated' security tier as part of an 'ask' proof-header flow. If the server rejects that elevated request with a 4xx error, the client logs the reason and retries the same bound-session creation without asking for elevation. A new telemetry event, cloud_elevated_create, records whether the elevation request was honored, unsupported, or refused, distinguishing reasons like an untrusted device or an unavailable device check.

Why

This lets Claude Code opportunistically request a stronger security tier for a device-bound session while still falling back gracefully and completing the session setup if the server can't or won't grant it.

Gate state

No sentence about tengu_breezy_fairy on/off for this release; the finding notes it read off for this site's account and off for the anonymous baseline, with no reading taken under this release yet.

Read from
Names in the bundlecloud_elevated_create
Feature flag
tengu_breezy_fairy Off in both readings

The flag server returned off for the account this site reads and for the anonymous baseline. A reading of off cannot rule out a rollout these two readings sit outside of.

This account: off · anonymous baseline: off · compiled default in v2.1.274: off

These values were read against a different version of Claude Code, so treat them as the nearest reading available instead of one taken on this release.

Read once, for one account on one subscription tier, against v2.1.274. It isn't a statement about your account. What a flag value here can and cannot tell you

How sure we are
One source agreesOne thing we can check says the same as this entry.
The name it cites is new in this buildNew in this build: tengu_breezy_fairy

See this entry in the whole of v2.1.274 →