Sweep 19 Sep 2026 · 02:36Z Build v2.1.278 500 read Stable v2.1.267 Latest v2.1.278 Next v2.1.278 Feeds RSS JSON llms.txt Unofficial
Claude Code v2.1.268 ·

New fork_conversation capability splits a session's history into a new session

Claude Code and Remote Control can now fork a conversation's history, optionally from a specific point, into a brand-new session.

TierUse it nowhow much it should matter to you
Useful5my rating, 1 to 5
Signal4worth watching, 1 to 5
AreaSessionswhat it touches
KindNew Featuresin v2.1.268,
Group of 2 Use it now Notable No documentation found

Claude Code and Remote Control can now fork a conversation's history, optionally from a specific point, into a brand-new session.

What

  • A new control-request subtype, fork_conversation, lets a host or SDK client fork the current session's conversation — optionally truncated to a specific target message — into a brand-new session created via the SDK backend, seeded with the prior message history and tagged for provenance verification.
  • Remote Control gains a fork_conversation tool implementing this: it can fork from a specific message (target_message_uuid) or the whole transcript, writes a size-capped JSON "seed" file to disk, and uploads/attaches it to the newly created session, which can adopt, discard, or re-verify that seed on session start.
  • Failure cases are surfaced with specific reasons: "turn running", "commands queued", "prompt pending", "target not found", "history suppressed".

Why This lets you branch a conversation into a separate session (for example, to explore an alternative direction without losing the original), whether you're driving Claude Code through the SDK or through Remote Control.

Read from
Names in the bundlefork_conversation
Feature flag
tengu_cozy_pixel Not enough to say

Nothing here resolved what this flag was doing on this version, so nothing here should be read as on or off.

This account: no value returned · anonymous baseline: no value returned · compiled default in v2.1.268: off

Read once, for one account on one subscription tier, against v2.1.268. It isn't a statement about your account. What a flag value here can and cannot tell you

How sure we are
Something disagreesSomething we can check disagrees with this entry, or the writer said they could not settle it.
The writer flagged doubtWhether this feature is active for a given user is unread, since the gate `tengu_cozy_pixel` has no recorded reading.
The name it cites is new in this buildNew in this build: tengu_cozy_pixel

See this entry in the whole of v2.1.268 →