Remotely served edits are less likely to be blocked by the read-before-write rule.
What's wrong with this entry?
The rule that a file must be read before it is written or edited now treats calls served remotely as a separate case instead of always consulting the permission mode, so those calls are less likely to be blocked. Write's input validation also drops an async precheck that returned error code 15.
- Both
tengu_write_tool_not_read_hypotheticalandtengu_edit_tool_not_read_hypotheticalgain aservedCallfield recording whether the call came in remotely. - The guard computes that up front and folds it into the decision to skip.
- Applies unconditionally, with no flag.
tengu_write_tool_not_read_hypothetical, tengu_edit_tool_not_read_hypothetical
Strings lifted out of the shipped bundle, so the claim above can be checked against them.
Related
Other releases about the same thing. Found by shared names or similar wording; neither means one caused the other.
-
v2.1.232
Edits preserve a file's encoding and CRLF line endings
Both mention file editing
-
v2.1.236
Edit tool now tells the model to read out-of-directory files first
Both mention editing
-
v2.1.239
File uploads report why they failed and stop retrying forever
Both mention file