Forked tasks are given the main conversation's name so they can address it.
What's wrong with this entry?
A new template alongside the end-conversation prompt tells a forked task to address the main conversation by name, interpolated at runtime. The refusal text you see when a conversation ends is unchanged.
Claude ended the conversation. To continue, please start a new session.
Strings lifted out of the shipped bundle, so the claim above can be checked against them.
Related
Other releases about the same thing. Found by shared names or similar wording; neither means one caused the other.
-
v2.1.234
Another forged control tag is escaped in subagent output
Both mention subagent
-
v2.1.234
Spawned processes get
--flag=valuewhen the value looks like a flagBoth mention subagent
-
v2.1.235
New error for delegating to a subagent without naming one
Both mention subagent