The Projects prompt now explains how much authority an unmarked relayed owner reply carries.
What's wrong with this entry?
The system prompt for Claude Code Projects gained a block on the one relayed owner reply that arrives without a marker, shown as an assistant entry starting with "Coordinator session's message". It sets out how much such a reply authorises.
- A bare reply approves only the single action and target named in the coordinator message it answers, nothing broader.
- A question offering a list of options proposes nothing and is not an approval.
- The prompt's User Intent Rule 6, which lets specificity carry forward past a block, applies neither to marked timeline messages nor to these unmarked replies.
Coordinator session's message
Strings lifted out of the shipped bundle, so the claim above can be checked against them.
Related
Other releases about the same thing. Found by shared names or similar wording; neither means one caused the other.
-
v2.1.224
Cloud sessions can be created through a newer request shape
Both mention project
-
v2.1.224
Newer cloud session creation endpoint for review and plan sources
Both mention project
-
v2.1.227
Device-bound sessions reject
--projectand agent ownership up frontBoth mention project