Follow Discord
Sweep 22 Oct 2026 · 04:32Z Build v2.1.308 527 read Stable v2.1.308 Latest v2.1.308 Next v2.1.308 Feeds RSS JSON llms.txt llms-full.txt Unofficial

Claude Code v2.1.236 ·

The message tool's notify_when_idle parameter and its supporting layer

Claude can ask another session to ping it when idle, but the parameter is hidden unless the gate is on.

Nothing to try yet Notable In Development
JSON All of v2.1.236
Nothing to try yetTier: how much it should matter to you
2Useful: my rating, 1 to 5
4Signal: worth watching, 1 to 5
Cross-Session MessagingArea: what it touches
In DevelopmentKind: in v2.1.236,
What probably matters to youSection of the release

The notify_when_idle parameter is only added to the message tool's schema when cross-session messaging is enabled.

What

The tool Claude uses to message another session on the same machine gained a notify_when_idle input that subscribes to a single notice when that session next goes idle or exits; sent without a message body it is a pure subscription. The parameter is only added to the tool schema when cross-session messaging is on, so with the gate off the model never sees it.

Details
  • Gate: CLAUDE_CODE_HARBOR_KITE environment variable, otherwise tengu_harbor_kite (fallback false), plus tengu_harbor_kite_win (fallback false) on Windows. Absent server config, invisible.
  • Refusal reasons each get their own sentence: no-inbox, self-target, peer-unsupported, unreachable-namespace, cap, peer-gone.
  • Subscriptions live in a table with a maximum size, eviction and expiry.
  • Sub-agents and teammates are refused, recorded as subscribe_refused_principal, under cross_session_notify_idle telemetry.
Evidence

Ask a session ON THIS MACHINE to send you ONE notice when it next goes idle

Strings lifted out of the shipped bundle, so the claim above can be checked against them.

Read from
Names in the bundlenotify_when_idle
Feature flag
tengu_harbor_kite Off by default, switched on for this account

The shipped code defaults this off, and the flag server returned on for the one account this site reads on this version. That is the reading that makes the entry above worth a second look, and it still says nothing about your account.

This account: on · anonymous baseline: on · compiled default in v2.1.236: off

tengu_harbor_kite_win Off in both readings

The flag server returned off for the account this site reads and for the anonymous baseline. A reading of off cannot rule out a rollout these two readings sit outside of.

This account: off · anonymous baseline: off · compiled default in v2.1.236: off

Read once, for one account on one subscription tier, against v2.1.236. It isn't a statement about your account. What a flag value here can and cannot tell you

What has happened since
Flag reading moved The flag server now returns on for tengu_harbor_kite, read as this account. A reading is one sample. Claude Code evaluates its flags remotely, so no client sees the targeting rule behind a value and this says nothing about your account.
Flag reading moved The flag server now returns off for tengu_harbor_kite, read as this account. A reading is one sample. Claude Code evaluates its flags remotely, so no client sees the targeting rule behind a value and this says nothing about your account.
Flag reading moved The flag server now returns on for tengu_harbor_kite, read as this account. A reading is one sample. Claude Code evaluates its flags remotely, so no client sees the targeting rule behind a value and this says nothing about your account.
Flag reading moved The flag server now returns nothing at all, having stopped carrying it for tengu_harbor_kite, read as this account. A reading is one sample. Claude Code evaluates its flags remotely, so no client sees the targeting rule behind a value and this says nothing about your account.

See this across every release →

How sure we are
One source agreesOne thing we can check says the same as this entry.
Anthropic's release notes agreeAdded notify_when_idle to cross-session SendMessage: ask another Claude Code session on this machine to send one notice when it next goes…

See this entry in the whole of v2.1.236 →

Feedback