Nothing to try yetTier: how much it should matter to you
2Useful: my rating, 1 to 5
3Signal: worth watching, 1 to 5
ThinkingArea: what it touches
In DevelopmentKind: in v2.1.227,
In DevelopmentSection of the release
Thinking-block resumption matches more model spellings but its flag defaults to false.
What
The check that decides whether an interrupted thinking block can be resumed no longer demands an exact match against two model ids; it now compares canonical forms and a known alias set, so aliases of the same model qualify. Still off unless the tengu_thinking_block_resumption flag is enabled, which defaults to false.
Evidence
tengu_thinking_block_resumption
Strings lifted out of the shipped bundle, so the claim above can be checked against them.
Read from
Feature flag
tengu_thinking_block_resumptionOff in both readings
The flag server returned off for the account this site reads and for the anonymous baseline. A reading of off cannot rule out a rollout these two readings sit outside of.
This account: off · anonymous baseline: off · compiled default in v2.1.227: off
These values were read against a different version of Claude Code, so treat them as the nearest reading available instead of one taken on this release.
Flag reading movedThe flag server now returns off for tengu_thinking_block_resumption, read as this account.A reading is one sample. Claude Code evaluates its flags remotely, so no client sees the targeting rule behind a value and this says nothing about your account.
Flag reading movedThe flag server now returns nothing at all, having stopped carrying it for tengu_thinking_block_resumption, read as this account.A reading is one sample. Claude Code evaluates its flags remotely, so no client sees the targeting rule behind a value and this says nothing about your account.
