{"version":"2.1.227","anchor":"resuming-an-interrupted-thinking-block-accepts-more-model-sp","canonical_anchor":"resuming-an-interrupted-thinking-block-accepts-more-model-sp","heading":"Resuming an interrupted thinking block accepts more model spellings","tier":"soon","area":"Thinking","scope":null,"heads_up":null,"url":"https:\/\/changelogs.core-directive.com\/v\/2.1.227\/e\/resuming-an-interrupted-thinking-block-accepts-more-model-sp","release_url":"https:\/\/changelogs.core-directive.com\/v\/2.1.227","markdown":"### Resuming an interrupted thinking block accepts more model spellings\n\nResuming an interrupted thinking block now accepts model aliases, but the feature stays off.\n\n**What**\n\nThe check that decides whether an interrupted thinking block can be resumed no longer demands an exact match against two model ids; it now compares canonical forms and a known alias set, so aliases of the same model qualify. Still off unless the `tengu_thinking_block_resumption` flag is enabled, which defaults to false.\n\n**Evidence**\n\n`tengu_thinking_block_resumption`\n\n- Flag `tengu_thinking_block_resumption`: Off in both readings (read for one account on one subscription tier against v2.1.227; this account: off, anonymous baseline: off, compiled default: off) These values were read against a different version of Claude Code, so treat them as the nearest reading available instead of one taken on this release.\n- Area: Thinking\n- Tier: Nothing to try yet\n- Useful: 2\/5\n- Signal: 3\/5\n- Present in the build but not switched on"}