Claude Code v2.1.222 ·
Codex import explains shell-exec marker refusals
Codex import now tells you exactly why a command was skipped and to port it manually.
You'll noticeTier: how much it should matter to you
2Useful: my rating, 1 to 5
0Signal: worth watching, 1 to 5
ElsewhereArea: what it touches
ImprovementsKind: in v2.1.222,
ImprovementsSection of the release
What
Three new refusal strings spell out why a command was not imported when its body mixes shell execution markers with argument placeholders.
Details
- Covers dangling markers, placeholders combined with backticks or
!, and shell blocks containing ! next to argument placeholders. - Each reason tells the user to port the command manually rather than silently dropping it.
Evidence
Contains a dangling shell-exec marker that argument substitution could complete into a live command at invocation time. Port it manually.
Strings lifted out of the shipped bundle, so the claim above can be checked against them.
See this entry in the whole of v2.1.222 →
