tengu_dunwich_bell Off in both readingsThe flag server returned off for the account this site reads and for the anonymous baseline. A reading of off cannot rule out a rollout these two readings sit outside of.
This account: off · anonymous baseline: off · compiled default in v2.1.105: no gate table built for this version
These values were read against a different version of Claude Code, so treat them as the nearest reading available instead of one taken on this release.
Read once, for one account on one subscription tier, against v2.1.105. It isn't a statement about your account. What a flag value here can and cannot tell you
What's wrong with this entry?
A "Did this help? (optional)" prompt allowing users to rate recalled memories as good or bad.
Stubbed — the gate function H_5() always returns !1 (false). The UI components (rating buttons with thumbs up/down hover states) are fully built but unreachable.
- Rating buttons component exists with [Good]/[Bad] options
- Keyboard shortcuts (+ and - keys) are wired up for rating
- The infrastructure includes both memory-specific and general feedback survey paths
- General feedback survey is also gated behind
tengu_dunwich_bell(default: false)
Stubbed gate (search for "Did this help?") and gate function returning !1
Strings lifted out of the shipped bundle, so the claim above can be checked against them.