{"version":"2.1.105","anchor":"memory-rating-survey-in-development","canonical_anchor":"memory-rating-survey-in-development","heading":"Memory Rating Survey [In Development]","tier":null,"area":null,"scope":null,"heads_up":null,"url":"https:\/\/changelogs.core-directive.com\/v\/2.1.105\/e\/memory-rating-survey-in-development","release_url":"https:\/\/changelogs.core-directive.com\/v\/2.1.105","markdown":"### Memory Rating Survey [In Development]\n\n**What**\n\nA \"Did this help? (optional)\" prompt allowing users to rate recalled memories as good or bad.\n\n**Status**\n\nStubbed \u2014 the gate function `H_5()` always returns `!1` (false). The UI components (rating buttons with thumbs up\/down hover states) are fully built but unreachable.\n\n**Details**\n\n- Rating buttons component exists with [Good]\/[Bad] options\n- Keyboard shortcuts (+ and - keys) are wired up for rating\n- The infrastructure includes both memory-specific and general feedback survey paths\n- General feedback survey is also gated behind `tengu_dunwich_bell` (default: false)\n\n**Evidence**\n\nStubbed gate (search for `\"Did this help?\"`) and gate function returning `!1`\n\n- Flag `tengu_dunwich_bell`: Off in both readings (read for one account on one subscription tier against v2.1.105; this account: off, anonymous baseline: off, compiled default: no gate table built for this version) These values were read against a different version of Claude Code, so treat them as the nearest reading available instead of one taken on this release."}