Code Review changedcode-review
Nearest release: v2.1.293, published an hour before upstream edited the page. Shown because the two are within 24 hours of each other. Nothing here says the release caused the edit.
Upstream edited this page at 7 Oct 2026 19:11 UTC, give or take a minute or two: the time comes from Anthropic’s own sitemap rather than from a commit. This site recorded the change at 7 Oct 2026 19:37 UTC.
Upstream edited
Recorded here
Lines+1added
Lines−1removed
From line
336
where the diff opens
First seen
14 Aug 2026
this site's first read of the page
Recorded edits21to this page, all time
The whole hunk
from line 336, old and new numbered
/
from line 336
336336
337337### Tune effort and arguments
338338
339Pass an [effort level](/docs/en/model-config#adjust-effort-level) to trade coverage for confidence. At `low` and `medium`, the review reports only the findings it's most confident in, so you see fewer false positives; `high` through `max` broaden coverage and may include findings the review is less sure about.
339Pass an [effort level](/docs/en/model-config#adjust-effort-level) to trade coverage for confidence. At `low`, the review reports the findings it's most confident in, so you see fewer false positives. From `medium` through `max`, the review broadens coverage.
340340
341341When you don't type a level, the review reuses the last level from `low` through `max` you typed, even in an earlier session, and Claude Code shows a notice such as `Reusing high effort, the level you typed last time`. Type a level, like `/code-review high`, to change what later runs reuse; a level you pass in a non-interactive `-p` run doesn't update it. `ultra` neither updates nor uses the remembered level. If you've never typed a level, the review uses the session's current effort. Before v2.1.223, a `/code-review` without a level always used the session's current effort.
342342
No line in this hunk matches that.