Follow Discord
Sweep 22 Oct 2026 · 04:32Z Build v2.1.308 527 read Stable v2.1.308 Latest v2.1.308 Next v2.1.308 Feeds RSS JSON llms.txt llms-full.txt Unofficial

Claude Code v2.1.300 ·

Submitted prompts can now be held, screened, rewritten or dropped

New code can hold a submitted prompt for screening and then rewrite or drop it, with hold details passed through slash commands and ultraplan

Group of 2 Under the hood Internal Changes
JSON All of v2.1.300
Under the hoodTier: how much it should matter to you
4Useful: my rating, 1 to 5
4Signal: worth watching, 1 to 5
Prompt InputArea: what it touches
Internal ChangesKind: in v2.1.300,
What probably matters to youSection of the release

Unclear What switches this screening on and where the verdict comes from are not shown.

What

Claude Code has new code that can hold back a prompt after you submit it, screen it, and then let it through, rewrite it or drop it.

  • A held prompt gets a "screened" verdict, which can drop it or rewrite it. The verdict is then applied to the held items. When no verdict is known, the result is marked noVerdict.
  • The code handles interruptions while a prompt is held.
  • The input path now passes along information about what happened to the prompt. It includes whether the prompt was forked, ranAs (the text actually run), withheld or passed, and isHeldForOrganization, which marks a prompt held for an organization. It also tracks when a hold was settled or handed on.
  • userPromptHold and userPromptLine are passed into slash-command handling and into the ultraplan keyword path.

What decides whether this screening runs was not worked out.

Why

This appears to let an organization screen prompts, so what you type could be held, changed or not sent at all. If a prompt does not go through as you wrote it, this may be why.

How sure we are
Something disagreesSomething we can check disagrees with this entry, or the writer said they could not settle it.
The writer flagged doubtWhat switches this screening on and where the verdict comes from are not shown.

See this entry in the whole of v2.1.300 →

Feedback