Follow Discord
Sweep 08 Oct 2026 · 18:53Z Build v2.1.295 516 read Stable v2.1.286 Latest v2.1.295 Next v2.1.295 Feeds RSS JSON llms.txt llms-full.txt Unofficial

Claude Code v2.1.293 ·

Saved memories are now linked to the prompt that produced them

When Claude Code saves memories from your conversation through MCP, it now passes along the prompt that led to them

Under the hood Internal Changes
JSON All of v2.1.293
Under the hoodTier: how much it should matter to you
2Useful: my rating, 1 to 5
3Signal: worth watching, 1 to 5
MemoryArea: what it touches
Internal ChangesKind: in v2.1.293,
Internal ChangesSection of the release

Unclear It is not clear whether the change to the skip check alters when memories are written directly or only renames a value.

What

Claude Code can review your conversation and save useful points as memories. Both the pass that runs when the session goes idle and the pass that runs at the end now keep a copy of your prompt that led to those memories. In the mode that works through MCP, the Model Context Protocol for connecting outside tools, that prompt is passed along with the request as the event the memories cite.

The check that decides when to skip writing memories directly also changed which value it looks at.

Why

Each saved memory can now be traced back to the prompt that produced it.

Read from
Feature flag
tengu_bramble_lintel Not enough to say

Nothing here resolved what this flag was doing on this version, so nothing here should be read as on or off.

This account: no value returned · anonymous baseline: no value returned · compiled default in v2.1.293: not a boolean we can read

These values were read against a different version of Claude Code, so treat them as the nearest reading available instead of one taken on this release.

Read once, for one account on one subscription tier, against v2.1.293. It isn't a statement about your account. What a flag value here can and cannot tell you

How sure we are
Something disagreesSomething we can check disagrees with this entry, or the writer said they could not settle it.
The writer flagged doubtIt is not clear whether the change to the skip check alters when memories are written directly or only renames a value.

See this entry in the whole of v2.1.293 →

Feedback