Follow Discord
Sweep 08 Oct 2026 · 18:53Z Build v2.1.295 516 read Stable v2.1.286 Latest v2.1.295 Next v2.1.295 Feeds RSS JSON llms.txt llms-full.txt Unofficial

Claude Code v2.1.292 ·

Remote sessions can decline permission requests nobody answers

In remote sessions, a permission request left unanswered long enough can be declined automatically, with Claude told not to retry

You'll notice Improvements
JSON All of v2.1.292
You'll noticeTier: how much it should matter to you
3Useful: my rating, 1 to 5
3Signal: worth watching, 1 to 5
SessionsArea: what it touches
ImprovementsKind: in v2.1.292,
ImprovementsSection of the release

Unclear Whether a built-in waiting time of 0 leaves this off unless it is set remotely is not confirmed.

What

A permission request is the prompt where Claude Code asks you to allow an action. In a remote session, which runs on a server rather than on your own computer, Claude Code can now decline such a request when nobody answers it. This happens only after the session has been held on the server long enough and the request has waited long enough. Claude then gets the message: "Nobody answered this permission request; the person may be away. Do not retry the call."

The waiting time comes from a server setting whose built-in value is 0, and Claude Code only acts after it has fresh values from the server.

Why

A remote session left alone no longer stalls forever on a question nobody is there to answer. If you step away, you may come back to find a request was declined rather than still waiting.

Read from
Feature flag
tengu_misty_aurora Not enough to say

Nothing here resolved what this flag was doing on this version, so nothing here should be read as on or off.

This account: no value returned · anonymous baseline: no value returned · compiled default in v2.1.292: not a boolean we can read

These values were read against a different version of Claude Code, so treat them as the nearest reading available instead of one taken on this release.

Read once, for one account on one subscription tier, against v2.1.292. It isn't a statement about your account. What a flag value here can and cannot tell you

What has happened since
Flag reading moved The flag server now returns nothing at all, having stopped carrying it for tengu_misty_aurora, read as this account. A reading is one sample. Claude Code evaluates its flags remotely, so no client sees the targeting rule behind a value and this says nothing about your account.

See this across every release →

How sure we are
Something disagreesSomething we can check disagrees with this entry, or the writer said they could not settle it.
The writer flagged doubtWhether a built-in waiting time of 0 leaves this off unless it is set remotely is not confirmed.
The name it cites is new in this buildNew in this build: tengu_misty_aurora

See this entry in the whole of v2.1.292 →

Feedback