Follow Discord
Sweep 01 Oct 2026 · 17:27Z Build v2.1.287 508 read Stable v2.1.285 Latest v2.1.287 Next v2.1.287 Feeds RSS JSON llms.txt llms-full.txt Unofficial

Claude Code v2.1.287 ·

New permission prompts for commands naming settings files and web addresses sent to cloud MCP tools

Shell commands that name Claude Code settings or credential files now ask first, and web addresses get their own verdict for cloud MCP tools

Group of 3 You'll notice Improvements
JSON All of v2.1.287
You'll noticeTier: how much it should matter to you
2Useful: my rating, 1 to 5
3Signal: worth watching, 1 to 5
PermissionsArea: what it touches
ImprovementsKind: in v2.1.287,
ImprovementsSection of the release

What

Claude Code's permission check decides whether a command runs straight away or asks you first. It gains two new reasons to ask:

  • settings_file_named: a shell command that is not read-only and names one of Claude Code's own settings or credential files is raised from allow to ask, with the message "This command names one of ...'s own Claude Code settings or credential files". This case is now recorded alongside the existing holds for the 'settings' and 'uncertain' verdicts.
  • served_mcp_web_address: applies when a web address is given to one of a cloud session's own MCP tools, which are add-on tools the session provides. It also blocks the shortcut that would allow the command automatically from an allowlist.
  • web_address verdict: when scanning a shell command for file paths, a bare word that looks like a web address with no local path meaning now returns "web_address" instead of going through the protected-path check. Before, such a word could come back as ask or deny as if it touched a protected file. This scan change sits behind a feature check.

Why

Cloud and device sessions will ask before more commands that touch Claude Code's settings, while commands that only mention a web address are no longer treated as if they touched a protected path.

How sure we are
Something disagreesSomething we can check disagrees with this entry, or the writer said they could not settle it.
The writer flagged doubtIt is not clear whether this check is switched on, as it depends on a condition that was not traced.

See this entry in the whole of v2.1.287 →

Feedback