Follow Discord
Sweep 10 Nov 2026 · 02:18Z Build v2.1.322 539 read Stable v2.1.311 Latest v2.1.322 Next v2.1.322 Feeds RSS JSON llms.txt llms-full.txt Unofficial

Claude Code v2.1.283 ·

/code-review ultra launch dialog ignores some accidental selections

The /code-review ultra confirmation dialog now ignores selections that arrive during a refusal window, and branch reviews show an extra scope line

You'll notice Improvements
JSON All of v2.1.283
You'll noticeTier: how much it should matter to you
2Useful: my rating, 1 to 5
1Signal: worth watching, 1 to 5
ElsewhereArea: what it touches
ImprovementsKind: in v2.1.283,
ImprovementsSection of the release

Unclear It is not settled that the refusal window is a period of time right after the dialog opens.

What

Before a deep cloud review starts with /code-review ultra, a dialog asks you to confirm. Selections that arrive during a refusal window are now ignored and noted, instead of being acted on at once. When reviewing a branch, the dialog also shows an extra line describing what the review will cover.

Why

It lowers the chance of starting a costly cloud review by accident.

Read from
Names in the bundle/code-review ultra
Since it was published

The entry above is what we published on the day. These lines were added later, as Anthropic's own pages caught up, and they sit beside the original rather than replacing it.

Added since A small documentation edit on Code Review touched a line naming /code-review ultra after this was published. Ultrareview requires authentication with a claude.ai account and is not available on Amazon Bedrock, Google Cloud's Agent Platform, or Microsoft Foundry, or to organizations with Zero Data Retention enabled or with the [HIPAA configuration… code-review see the edit
Confirmed since Anthropic's documentation has since written up /code-review ultra, on Find bugs with ultrareview. `claude -p '/code-review ultra'` doesn't get you the findings, so use `claude ultrareview` in scripts. The `-p` run launches the cloud review and exits without waiting for it. When the review would bill usage credits, the `-p` run stops wi… ultrareview see the edit
How sure we are
Something disagreesSomething we can check disagrees with this entry, or the writer said they could not settle it.
The writer flagged doubtIt is not settled that the refusal window is a period of time right after the dialog opens.
Anthropic's documentation agreesAnthropic's documentation has since written up /code-review ultra, on Find bugs with ultrareview.

See this entry in the whole of v2.1.283 →

Feedback