Follow Discord
Sweep 22 Sep 2026 · 17:19Z Build v2.1.280 501 read Stable v2.1.267 Latest v2.1.280 Next v2.1.280 Feeds RSS JSON llms.txt Unofficial
Claude Code v2.1.271 ·

New turn_preempted event lets a rapid follow-up message interrupt a running turn

Claude Code can now stop a running turn on its own when a follow-up arrives before any output appeared, if the connected client opts in

TierNothing to try yethow much it should matter to you
Useful4my rating, 1 to 5
Signal4worth watching, 1 to 5
AreaSDKwhat it touches
KindIn Developmentin v2.1.271,
Group of 6 Nothing to try yet Notable No documentation found

Claude Code can now stop a running turn on its own when a follow-up arrives before any output appeared, if the connected client opts in

What

  • A new system/turn_preempted event (reason rapid_followup) is sent when Claude Code itself stops a running turn because the person sent a follow-up message before the turn produced any output; any running shell commands are backgrounded rather than killed, and the follow-up is answered right away instead of waiting in queue.
  • This only happens when the connected client has declared support for it: a new SDK capability, rapidFollowupPreempt (declared via declareRapidFollowupPreempt, read back as sdkRapidFollowupPreempt()), mirrors the existing perTaskStopAffordance capability and tells Claude Code the client knows how to handle a turn_preempted event.
  • It is also gated behind a rollout flag (tengu_zippy_spindle), off by default, so both the client declaration and the flag must be enabled. Preemption is skipped for slash commands, bridge-originated messages, and similar cases where it wouldn't make sense.

Why Without this, sending a quick follow-up while Claude Code is still working on the previous message just queues it silently. With this enabled (and supported by the client), the follow-up can preempt the still-running turn so it gets addressed immediately.

Read from
Names in the bundlerapidFollowupPreempt
Feature flag
tengu_zippy_spindle Not enough to say

Nothing here resolved what this flag was doing on this version, so nothing here should be read as on or off.

This account: no value returned · anonymous baseline: no value returned · compiled default in v2.1.271: off

These values were read against a different version of Claude Code, so treat them as the nearest reading available instead of one taken on this release.

Read once, for one account on one subscription tier, against v2.1.271. It isn't a statement about your account. What a flag value here can and cannot tell you

How sure we are
One source agreesOne thing we can check says the same as this entry.
The name it cites is new in this buildNew in this build: tengu_zippy_spindle

See this entry in the whole of v2.1.271 →

Feedback