Follow Discord
Sweep 10 Nov 2026 · 02:18Z Build v2.1.322 539 read Stable v2.1.311 Latest v2.1.322 Next v2.1.322 Feeds RSS JSON llms.txt llms-full.txt Unofficial

Claude Code v2.1.271 ·

New turn_preempted event lets a rapid follow-up message interrupt a running turn

Claude Code can now stop a running turn on its own when a follow-up arrives before any output appeared, if the connected client opts in

Group of 6 Use it now Notable Nothing to try yet No documentation found In Development
JSON All of v2.1.271
Use it nowTier: how much it should matter to you
4Useful: my rating, 1 to 5
4Signal: worth watching, 1 to 5
Turn HandlingArea: what it touches
In DevelopmentKind: in v2.1.271,
What probably matters to youSection of the release

What

  • A new system/turn_preempted event (reason rapid_followup) is sent when Claude Code itself stops a running turn because the person sent a follow-up message before the turn produced any output; any running shell commands are backgrounded rather than killed, and the follow-up is answered right away instead of waiting in queue.
  • This only happens when the connected client has declared support for it: a new SDK capability, rapidFollowupPreempt (declared via declareRapidFollowupPreempt, read back as sdkRapidFollowupPreempt()), mirrors the existing perTaskStopAffordance capability and tells Claude Code the client knows how to handle a turn_preempted event.
  • It is also gated behind a rollout flag (tengu_zippy_spindle), off by default, so both the client declaration and the flag must be enabled. Preemption is skipped for slash commands, bridge-originated messages, and similar cases where it wouldn't make sense.

Why Without this, sending a quick follow-up while Claude Code is still working on the previous message just queues it silently. With this enabled (and supported by the client), the follow-up can preempt the still-running turn so it gets addressed immediately.

Read from
Names in the bundleturn_preempted
Feature flag
tengu_zippy_spindle Not enough to say

Nothing here resolved what this flag was doing on this version, so nothing here should be read as on or off.

This account: no value returned · anonymous baseline: no value returned · compiled default in v2.1.271: off

These values were read against a different version of Claude Code, so treat them as the nearest reading available instead of one taken on this release.

Read once, for one account on one subscription tier, against v2.1.271. It isn't a statement about your account. What a flag value here can and cannot tell you

How sure we are
One source agreesOne thing we can check says the same as this entry.
The name it cites is new in this buildNew in this build: tengu_zippy_spindle

See this entry in the whole of v2.1.271 →

Feedback