Follow Discord
Sweep 10 Nov 2026 · 02:18Z Build v2.1.322 539 read Stable v2.1.311 Latest v2.1.322 Next v2.1.322 Feeds RSS JSON llms.txt llms-full.txt Unofficial

Claude Code v2.1.265 ·

New five-class consent model for Artifact permissions (experimental)

An experimental 'five-class asks' mode reduces repeated Artifact permission prompts for pinning, reading, and commenting

Group of 4 Nothing to try yet Notable In Development
JSON All of v2.1.265
Nothing to try yetTier: how much it should matter to you
5Useful: my rating, 1 to 5
4Signal: worth watching, 1 to 5
ArtifactsArea: what it touches
In DevelopmentKind: in v2.1.265,
What probably matters to youSection of the release

Unclear What the permission-asking behavior actually changes when turned on is not described in the finding.

What

  • A new consent model for the Artifact tool, called "five-class asks," is being built behind the CLAUDE_CODE_ARTIFACT_FIVE_CLASS_ASKS environment variable (off by default), which latches the behavior on or off for the life of the process and reports whether it was on via telemetry.
  • When enabled, it changes how Claude asks for permission on artifact actions:
    • Pinning someone else's artifact to your own list is now auto-allowed instead of prompting.
    • Uploading, reading (list_assets/read_asset/list_files/read_file), commenting, and replying all go through a new classification system (pathAsk, readRule, flaggedSpelling, outsideAsk, hardLinked, plus an unknown/someone_else/from_type/cowritten split) and a new ruling flow, instead of always asking.
    • Uploads get an "already approved this session" fast path.
    • Reading someone else's shared artifact can be auto-allowed via a per-conversation "class consent" latch, with the message "Reading ... needs no approval"; wording also changed from "another person's artifact" to "someone else's artifact."
  • When the experiment is off, the previous single-path deny/ask logic is used unchanged.

Why

This reduces how often Claude has to interrupt with a permission prompt for routine, low-risk artifact actions, like pinning or re-reading something already approved, while still asking for genuinely new or risky ones.

How sure we are
Something disagreesSomething we can check disagrees with this entry, or the writer said they could not settle it.
The writer flagged doubtWhat the permission-asking behavior actually changes when turned on is not described in the finding.

See this entry in the whole of v2.1.265 →

Feedback