A new check decides whether a teammate agent is offered its own git worktree.
What's wrong with this entry?
Before falling back to running a teammate agent in its own git worktree, Claude Code now consults an eligibility helper first and only then takes a new fallback path. The existing refusal, that in-process teammates cannot spawn background agents, is unchanged; what is new is a gate deciding whether worktree isolation is offered at all.
- The helper is the renamed successor of the previous check, and what makes a session eligible is decided inside it rather than at this call site.
In-process teammates cannot spawn background agents
Strings lifted out of the shipped bundle, so the claim above can be checked against them.
Related
Other releases about the same thing. Found by shared names or similar wording; neither means one caused the other.
-
v2.1.235
Question options with identical text are no longer confused with each other
Both mention agent
-
v2.1.236
Teammate messages whose summary swallowed the body are split back apart
Both mention agent
-
v2.1.238
Claude is told to stay in a worktree even when it did not create one
Both mention agent