Limit messages stop pointing at /usage-credits when that flow isn't available to you.
What's wrong with this entry?
Limit and rate-limit messages now pick their wording based on whether the credits flow is actually available to you.
- Admin-limit text is either " · run /usage-credits to ask your admin for a higher limit" or the plain " · ask your admin for a higher limit"; the same helper now supplies this for the member-level-disabled and group-zero-credit-limit messages, which used to hard-code the command.
- The spend-cap branch chooses between " · run /usage-credits to raise it, or visit claude.ai/admin-settings/usage" and " · visit claude.ai/admin-settings/usage to raise it".
- The 1M-context 429 hint now has three branches: the web console link, the existing /usage-credits plus /model wording, and a new fallback mentioning only
run /model to switch to standard context. - The choice comes from an internal predicate whose input is not visible in the build.
· ask your admin for a higher limit, run /model to switch to standard context
Strings lifted out of the shipped bundle, so the claim above can be checked against them.
Related
Other releases about the same thing. Found by shared names or similar wording; neither means one caused the other.
-
v2.1.232
Out-of-credits and spend-limit messages rewritten for non-interactive runs
Both mention usage credit limit
-
v2.1.236
Extra-usage panel now shows for team and enterprise accounts
Both mention usage limit
-
v2.1.236
Wrap-up hint near the usage limit is now per-plan and once per window
Both mention usage limit