Follow Discord
Sweep 22 Oct 2026 · 04:32Z Build v2.1.308 527 read Stable v2.1.308 Latest v2.1.308 Next v2.1.308 Feeds RSS JSON llms.txt llms-full.txt Unofficial

Claude Code v2.1.248 ·

Remote approval answers may carry a rules block, and a bad one is skipped

Remote approval answers may carry their own permission rules, capped and dropped if unreadable.

You'll notice Notable New Features
JSON All of v2.1.248
You'll noticeTier: how much it should matter to you
3Useful: my rating, 1 to 5
4Signal: worth watching, 1 to 5
Remote ApprovalsArea: what it touches
New FeaturesKind: in v2.1.248,
What probably matters to youSection of the release
What

The format for a remote host's "needs approval" answer gained an optional block of its own permission rules. Each line is cleaned up and whitespace-collapsed, and both the count and the length of lines are capped: the allow and environment lists keep the first entries, the deny lists the last. A block that cannot be read is dropped and the request is still judged, rather than failing.

Evidence

[remote-tools] dropped an unreadable auto_mode block from a needs_approval answer; the ask is judged without it

Strings lifted out of the shipped bundle, so the claim above can be checked against them.

See this entry in the whole of v2.1.248 →

Feedback