Follow Discord
Sweep 22 Oct 2026 · 04:32Z Build v2.1.308 527 read Stable v2.1.308 Latest v2.1.308 Next v2.1.308 Feeds RSS JSON llms.txt llms-full.txt Unofficial

Claude Code v2.1.246 ·

Hook approvals can be sent back through the auto-mode classifier

Hook-approved tool calls could still be checked by the auto-mode classifier, but the flag is off.

Nothing to try yet In Development
JSON All of v2.1.246
Nothing to try yetTier: how much it should matter to you
2Useful: my rating, 1 to 5
0Signal: worth watching, 1 to 5
PermissionsArea: what it touches
In DevelopmentKind: in v2.1.246,
In DevelopmentSection of the release

Re-running hook-approved calls through the permission classifier sits behind a flag whose fallback is off.

What

When a hook approves a tool call that would run in auto mode, Claude Code can now stop treating that as final and run the call through the permission classifier anyway, with a note that the hook vouched for it. The branch sits behind a flag whose built-in fallback is off, so without a remote value hook approvals still bypass the classifier as before.

Details
  • Gate: tengu_virtual_knuth, defaulting to off in the shipped code.
  • Logs tengu_auto_mode_hook_allow_funneled with tool name, whether it is MCP, and the hook's source bucketed to settings, plugin, skill or other.
  • Auto-mode decision events gained a field recording the hook vouch.
  • Debug output says the hook approved the tool use but auto mode requires classifier adjudication.
Evidence

tengu_auto_mode_hook_allow_funneled

Strings lifted out of the shipped bundle, so the claim above can be checked against them.

Read from
Feature flag
tengu_virtual_knuth Not enough to say

Nothing here resolved what this flag was doing on this version, so nothing here should be read as on or off.

This account: no value returned · anonymous baseline: no value returned · compiled default in v2.1.246: off

Read once, for one account on one subscription tier, against v2.1.246. It isn't a statement about your account. What a flag value here can and cannot tell you

How sure we are
One source agreesOne thing we can check says the same as this entry.
The name it cites is new in this buildNew in this build: tengu_virtual_knuth

See this entry in the whole of v2.1.246 →

Feedback