Follow Discord
Sweep 22 Oct 2026 · 04:32Z Build v2.1.308 527 read Stable v2.1.308 Latest v2.1.308 Next v2.1.308 Feeds RSS JSON llms.txt llms-full.txt Unofficial

Claude Code v2.1.246 ·

Artifact comments refuse organization service keys

Artifact comments now explain org service key failures clearly, but comments themselves need an env var.

Nothing to try yet Notable No documentation found In Development
JSON All of v2.1.246
Nothing to try yetTier: how much it should matter to you
2Useful: my rating, 1 to 5
3Signal: worth watching, 1 to 5
ArtifactsArea: what it touches
In DevelopmentKind: in v2.1.246,
What probably matters to youSection of the release

Clearer service-key errors ship inside artifact comments, which require CLAUDE_CODE_ARTIFACT_COMMENTS or a gate that falls back to off.

What

Resolving a comment thread, or replying and resolving, now stops with an explanation to pass on to you when the session is authenticated with an organization service key that has no Claude agent grant, rather than failing obscurely. Artifact comments as a whole require the environment variable CLAUDE_CODE_ARTIFACT_COMMENTS or the tengu_teal_corbel gate, which falls back to off, so this is unreachable in a default build.

Details
  • The refusal is recorded as a service_key_credential reason in the artifact_comment_session_resolve log.
  • The same gate covers new fields sent with comments recording auto-reply, edit permission, whose turn it is, whether the thread was named by the user, and declined replies.
Evidence

this session's credential is an organization service key with no Claude agent grant, so it cannot post or resolve comments

Strings lifted out of the shipped bundle, so the claim above can be checked against them.

Read from
Feature flag
tengu_teal_corbel Off by default, switched on for this account

The shipped code defaults this off, and the flag server returned on for the one account this site reads on this version. That is the reading that makes the entry above worth a second look, and it still says nothing about your account.

This account: on · anonymous baseline: on · compiled default in v2.1.246: off

Read once, for one account on one subscription tier, against v2.1.246. It isn't a statement about your account. What a flag value here can and cannot tell you

What has happened since
Flag reading moved The flag server now returns on for tengu_teal_corbel, read as this account. A reading is one sample. Claude Code evaluates its flags remotely, so no client sees the targeting rule behind a value and this says nothing about your account.
Flag reading moved The flag server now returns nothing at all, having stopped carrying it for tengu_teal_corbel, read as this account. A reading is one sample. Claude Code evaluates its flags remotely, so no client sees the targeting rule behind a value and this says nothing about your account.

See this across every release →

See this entry in the whole of v2.1.246 →

Feedback