/artifact-pr-review now flags a review page whose approval marker looks edited outside the CLI.
What's wrong with this entry?
Verifying a published review page is more tolerant of formatting differences, and there is a new failure for a page whose approval marker is written in a form this CLI never produces. That is treated as a sign the page was edited somewhere else, and the recorded decision is not trusted.
- The matcher for the approval element and the regex for the embedded page-state script now accept extra attributes on
<body>and on the<script>tag. - The new failure fires on markup or an unrecognized character reference in the marker, and tells you to re-run
/artifact-pr-reviewto publish a fresh review.
the page was edited outside this CLI and its recorded decision cannot be verified; re-run /artifact-pr-review to publish a fresh review
Strings lifted out of the shipped bundle, so the claim above can be checked against them.
Related
Other releases about the same thing. Found by shared names or similar wording; neither means one caused the other.
-
v2.1.219
Republishing an artifact page now verifies it came from this CLI build
Both mention review
-
v2.1.219
PR-review artifact description has an alternate wording that cannot ship in this build
Both mention review
-
v2.1.221
PR review pages get a dismiss link and a stamp control
Both mention review