Source Intelligence

DisclaimerUnofficial, and not affiliated with Anthropic. Nearly all of this is read straight out of what ships: npm bundles, captured prompts, published docs. Anthropic's own notes go in verbatim, marked as theirs. The rest is my reading, and every entry carries the strings behind it. If one looks wrong, vote it down and say why.

All of v2.1.236 Home All releases olderv2.1.235 v2.1.237newer
Claude Code v2.1.236

Resumed sessions explain why they did not re-arm comment replies on an Artifact

You'll notice
Useful3 Signal4
Artifacts

Resuming now says exactly why it did not re-enable automatic comment replies on each Artifact.

What

When you resume a session, Claude Code no longer silently re-enables automatic replies to comments on published Artifacts. It re-arms only what it can, and prints a reason for each one it skipped: you stopped watching it last time, this account cannot publish to that Artifact, another session may already be replying, it could not confirm no other session is replying, or you are already watching the cap of 5 Artifacts at once.

Details
  • At most the most recent Artifact's comment monitor comes back on resume; a summary line names up to two Artifacts that were left unwatched.
  • The skip reasons are internal codes with one sentence each: recorded_stop, not_editor, holder_unknown, held_by_background, watch_cap and watch_cap_reconnect.
  • The watch limit of 5 comes from a constant interpolated into the message, so the sentence always matches the real cap.
  • Re-arming calls are marked as resumes, and an Artifact recorded as armed carries forward the consent to publish replies, so you are not asked again.
Evidence

a resumed session brings back at most its most recent Artifact's comment monitor

Strings lifted out of the shipped bundle, so the claim above can be checked against them.

See this entry in the whole of v2.1.236 →