Follow Discord
Sweep 22 Oct 2026 · 04:32Z Build v2.1.308 527 read Stable v2.1.308 Latest v2.1.308 Next v2.1.308 Feeds RSS JSON llms.txt llms-full.txt Unofficial

Claude Code v2.1.232 ·

Two review-workflow config flags dropped

Two server-side switches that steered review behaviour are gone, so reviews no longer vary by remote config.

Under the hood Removed
JSON All of v2.1.232
Under the hoodTier: how much it should matter to you
2Useful: my rating, 1 to 5
3Signal: worth watching, 1 to 5
Code ReviewArea: what it touches
RemovedKind: in v2.1.232,
RemovedSection of the release
What

The helpers that consulted the tengu_report_findings_tool and tengu_review_workflow_routing remote-config flags are gone, and neither name appears anywhere in this build, so those paths no longer branch on server config.

Details
  • The prompts for /code-review, /simplify and batch orchestration moved into modules loaded on demand; the eager imports were dropped from the workflow module.
Evidence

/simplify → 4 cleanup agents in parallel → apply the fixes

Strings lifted out of the shipped bundle, so the claim above can be checked against them.

Read from
Feature flag
tengu_report_findings_tool On for this account, and not off by default

The flag server returned on for the one account this site reads, and nothing in this release compiles it off by default. The compiled default is shown below, and says which it is when we cannot read one: a fifth of gates compile in a string or a number rather than on or off, and most published releases have no gate table behind them at all. No client can see what the server returns for your account.

This account: on · anonymous baseline: on · compiled default in v2.1.232: not a boolean we can read

These values were read against a different version of Claude Code, so treat them as the nearest reading available instead of one taken on this release.

tengu_review_workflow_routing Off in both readings

The flag server returned off for the account this site reads and for the anonymous baseline. A reading of off cannot rule out a rollout these two readings sit outside of.

This account: off · anonymous baseline: off · compiled default in v2.1.232: not a boolean we can read

These values were read against a different version of Claude Code, so treat them as the nearest reading available instead of one taken on this release.

Read once, for one account on one subscription tier, against v2.1.232. It isn't a statement about your account. What a flag value here can and cannot tell you

What has happened since
Flag reading moved The flag server now returns on for tengu_report_findings_tool, read as this account. A reading is one sample. Claude Code evaluates its flags remotely, so no client sees the targeting rule behind a value and this says nothing about your account.
Flag reading moved The flag server now returns off for tengu_report_findings_tool, read as this account. A reading is one sample. Claude Code evaluates its flags remotely, so no client sees the targeting rule behind a value and this says nothing about your account.
Flag reading moved The flag server now returns on for tengu_report_findings_tool, read as this account. A reading is one sample. Claude Code evaluates its flags remotely, so no client sees the targeting rule behind a value and this says nothing about your account.
Flag reading moved The flag server now returns nothing at all, having stopped carrying it for tengu_report_findings_tool, read as this account. A reading is one sample. Claude Code evaluates its flags remotely, so no client sees the targeting rule behind a value and this says nothing about your account.

See this across every release →

How sure we are
One source agreesOne thing we can check says the same as this entry.
Anthropic's release notes agree/code-review at high, xhigh, and max effort now runs in a background agent like the other levels

See this entry in the whole of v2.1.232 →

Feedback