Remote sessions can be told activity happened in a linked conversation, flagged as not your instruction and never an approval.
What's wrong with this entry?
Messages arriving over the remote bridge may now carry an activity observation, for things like an edit or a reaction on the linked conversation. The message is wrapped with a preamble saying activity was observed, plus a guard telling the model this was not typed by you, is never an approval, and must not be re-processed as a fresh request.
- Only applies when the inbound message comes from a recognised origin; previously the only extra inbound field handled was a receiver grouping id.
- The guard exists specifically so an observed edit or reaction cannot be read as consent for a pending action.
Activity was observed in the bound conversation
Strings lifted out of the shipped bundle, so the claim above can be checked against them.