If peer listing failed, the not-found message now says other machines could not be checked.
What's wrong with this entry?
When you name a peer session that is not found, the refusal now adds a note if the listing of sessions reachable over the remote bridge timed out or failed, explaining those sessions can only be replied to from this machine and cannot be addressed by name.
- Backed by a marker recording why the listing failed, with values
timeoutandfetch_failed.
and files can't be sent to it by name from this machine.
Strings lifted out of the shipped bundle, so the claim above can be checked against them.
Related
Other releases about the same thing. Found by shared names or similar wording; neither means one caused the other.
-
v2.1.234
Messages injected by a host are classified separately from peer messages
Both mention cross
-
v2.1.234
Cross-session control requests check ids more carefully
Both mention cross
-
v2.1.234
Notice acks now wait for the record to persist
Both mention cross