Follow Discord
Sweep 22 Oct 2026 · 04:32Z Build v2.1.308 527 read Stable v2.1.308 Latest v2.1.308 Next v2.1.308 Feeds RSS JSON llms.txt llms-full.txt Unofficial

Claude Code v2.1.223 ·

/code-review remembers the effort level you typed, and is hidden from the model by default

/code-review reuses the last effort level you typed, and Claude can no longer run it unprompted.

Use it now Notable New Features
JSON All of v2.1.223
Use it nowTier: how much it should matter to you
4Useful: my rating, 1 to 5
0Signal: worth watching, 1 to 5
Slash CommandsArea: what it touches
New FeaturesKind: in v2.1.223,
What probably matters to youSection of the release
What

Running /code-review without a level now reuses the level you last typed explicitly, and the command is no longer something Claude can invoke on its own unless a new gate is on.

Details
  • disableModelInvocation is now a function evaluated lazily; it returns true unless the gate tengu_dazzling_floyd is on, and the fallback is false, so by default the model cannot invoke /code-review itself
  • command registration treats a function-valued disableModelInvocation as true when serializing and installs it as a getter
  • two new slash-command hooks were added and allowlisted as declared fields: getDefaultEffort (returns an effort value plus a user-facing notice) and onUserTypedArgs (records the level you typed)
  • the last explicitly typed level is persisted to global config as codeReviewLastEffort
  • the dispatch path, including stacked commands, calls onUserTypedArgs, and when no explicit level is given it pushes the default-effort notice into the transcript as a notice message, in interactive sessions only
  • the prompt instructs the model to say in one short line which level is being reused, an unrecognized level now reports which level it fell back to, and the routing notice wording branches on a new willRunAsFork input
Usage
/code-review high
/code-review
Evidence

Reusing ${n} effort, the level you typed last time, reusing ${n}, the level the user typed last time, tengu_dazzling_floyd, getDefaultEffort

Strings lifted out of the shipped bundle, so the claim above can be checked against them.

Read from
Feature flag
tengu_dazzling_floyd Gate removed from the code

This release deleted the gate from the code while it was still reading on for the account this site reads, so the code path no longer asks a flag before running.

This account: on · anonymous baseline: on · compiled default in v2.1.223: not a boolean we can read

These values were read against a different version of Claude Code, so treat them as the nearest reading available instead of one taken on this release.

Read once, for one account on one subscription tier, against v2.1.223. It isn't a statement about your account. What a flag value here can and cannot tell you

What has happened since
Flag reading moved The flag server now returns on for tengu_dazzling_floyd, read as this account. A reading is one sample. Claude Code evaluates its flags remotely, so no client sees the targeting rule behind a value and this says nothing about your account.
Flag reading moved The flag server now returns nothing at all, having stopped carrying it for tengu_dazzling_floyd, read as this account. A reading is one sample. Claude Code evaluates its flags remotely, so no client sees the targeting rule behind a value and this says nothing about your account.
Gate removed from the code v2.1.246 removed the tengu_dazzling_floyd gate from the code while it was still reading on for the account this site reads. The code path no longer asks a flag before it runs.
Gate removed from the code v2.1.223 removed the tengu_dazzling_floyd gate from the code while it was still reading on for the account this site reads. The code path no longer asks a flag before it runs.

See this across every release →

How sure we are
Two sources agreeTwo things we can check say the same as this entry.
Anthropic's release notes agreeChanged /review to be an alias of /code-review, which reviews the current diff or a PR (/code-review <level> <pr#>); use /code-review ultra…
The name it cites is new in this buildNew in this build: tengu_dazzling_floyd

See this entry in the whole of v2.1.223 →

Feedback