Follow Discord
Sweep 22 Oct 2026 · 04:32Z Build v2.1.308 527 read Stable v2.1.308 Latest v2.1.308 Next v2.1.308 Feeds RSS JSON llms.txt llms-full.txt Unofficial

Claude Code v2.1.223 ·

Builtin /review command dropped; /code-review takes a target instead

The /review command is gone; /code-review now takes a PR number, branch or path.

Use it now Notable Removed
JSON All of v2.1.223
Use it nowTier: how much it should matter to you
5Useful: my rating, 1 to 5
0Signal: worth watching, 1 to 5
Slash CommandsArea: what it touches
RemovedKind: in v2.1.223,
What probably matters to youSection of the release
What

The separate GitHub pull request review command is gone, and its job folded into /code-review, which now accepts an argument naming what to review.

Details
  • Removed: the prompt command named "review", described as "Review a GitHub pull request; for your working diff use /code-review", with argument hint [pr number], along with its gh pr view and gh pr diff prompt text.
  • /code-review is now described as reviewing the current diff or a PR number, branch or path target.
  • The argument is passed into the workflow as a "Review target: " line.
  • /ultrareview is unaffected.
Evidence

Review a GitHub pull request; for your working diff use /code-review, Review the current diff, or a PR number/branch/path target, for correctness bugs and reuse/simplification/efficiency cleanups at the given effort level

Strings lifted out of the shipped bundle, so the claim above can be checked against them.

Usage
/code-review 1234
Read from
How sure we are
One source agreesOne thing we can check says the same as this entry.
Anthropic's release notes agreeChanged /review to be an alias of /code-review, which reviews the current diff or a PR (/code-review <level> <pr#>); use /code-review ultra…

See this entry in the whole of v2.1.223 →

Feedback