Source Intelligence

DisclaimerUnofficial, and not affiliated with Anthropic. Nearly all of this is read straight out of what ships: npm bundles, captured prompts, published docs. Anthropic's own notes go in verbatim, marked as theirs. The rest is my reading, and every entry carries the strings behind it. If one looks wrong, vote it down and say why.

All of v2.1.186 Home All releases olderv2.1.185 v2.1.187newer
Claude Code v2.1.186

Security Classifier Scope Refined

The automode security classifier's scope description was sharpened to clarify exactly what it does and does not block.

Details
  • Scope now explicitly reads: "prevents destructive, hard-to-undo, or security-relevant actions only."
  • Explicitly out of scope: "fabricating or misreporting results; posting updates the user didn't ask for; poor code, wrong answers, looping, wasted tokens." These are for the user to correct, not the classifier.
  • A new EDIT REMOVALS annotation is now included in classifier context: removals in Edit calls are noted with removes / adds fields. Deletions are now weighted as seriously as additions. If removesTruncated: true, the full removal should be treated as significant.
  • NotebookEdit calls are annotated with mode and cell_id, and deleted cell content is treated as unverifiable per the high-severity rules.
Evidence

Revised classifier prompt (search for "EDIT REMOVALS: Edit calls show both \removes\" and "destructive, hard-to-undo, or security-relevant actions")

Strings lifted out of the shipped bundle, so the claim above can be checked against them.

See this entry in the whole of v2.1.186 →