Follow Discord
Sweep 10 Nov 2026 · 02:18Z Build v2.1.322 539 read Stable v2.1.311 Latest v2.1.322 Next v2.1.322 Feeds RSS JSON llms.txt llms-full.txt Unofficial
Home / Reference / Slash commands

/settings-review

slash never mined JSON

A Claude Code slash command, read out of the shipped bundle. No mined inventory carries it: everything below comes from what this site has written about it.

Claude Code now blocks direct writes to the settings-review staging store

Not Anthropic's. This is the line from the earliest changelog entry here that named it, v2.1.269.

First seen — never in a mined build
Last seen — never in a mined build
Builds0 / 161on this box, as of v2.1.322
Written about v2.1.269 first named in a changelog, 11 Sep 2026

In the changelogs

6

Releases whose published page names /settings-review.

  1. v2.1.282
    Approving settings-file edits from the desktop app's permission card is still off

    The code that records a desktop-app approval of a settings-file edit is now filled in, but a check that always says no keeps every edit going to /settings-review

    found in this entry's text, named in this entry

  2. v2.1.281
    Settings-file edit guard adds desktop-app, symlink and managed-policy refusal messages, but the path is off in this build

    Refusal messages for settings-file edits via the desktop app, symlinks or managed policy exist but cannot run in this build

    found in this entry's text

  3. v2.1.269
    New protection preventing direct writes to the settings-review store

    Claude Code now blocks direct writes to the settings-review staging store

    found in this entry's text, named in this entry

  4. v2.1.269
    New feature: settings file writes can be staged for owner review instead of applied directly

    New settings-review system can stage settings file changes for owner approval instead of applying them immediately, though it isn't active in this build

    found in this entry's text, named in this entry

  5. v2.1.269
    Edit tool result can now be 'staged for review' pending settings owner approval

    Edit tool results can now report a change as 'staged for review' instead of applied, when settings files require owner approval

    found in this entry's text, named in this entry

  6. v2.1.269
    New settings-review exemption bookkeeping for plugin/skill-managed settings paths

    /settings-review now recognizes more plugin-related settings file locations for its exemption rules

    found in this entry's text, named in this entry

First cited

4

The earliest release whose published evidence quoted /settings-review was v2.1.269, 11 Sep 2026. That is the oldest release this project wrote about it, so it is a floor on the name's age and not the release that introduced it. It is not a presence reading: which builds carried the name is the table below.

ReleaseDateThe span that was quoted
v2.1.26911 Sep 2026Staged Claude Code settings changes are the owner's to review in /settings-review; the review store cannot be written directly
v2.1.26911 Sep 2026Staged for review: ${e} was NOT modified. Changes to Claude Code settings files made without the owner of this computer approving them in person are held for their review; the owner applies or discards them with /settings-review
v2.1.26911 Sep 2026Staged for review: ${e} was NOT modified. Changes to Claude Code settings files made without the owner of this computer approving them in person are held for their review; the owner applies or discards them with /settings-review, and the change takes effect only if they accept it.
v2.1.26911 Sep 2026Staged for your review · not applied until you accept it in /settings-review

Presence across releases

0

The miner has never read a build containing this name. It is here because a changelog entry of ours names it, which is evidence that it existed and not evidence of which releases carried it. The inventory starts at v2.1.138 and everything older than that was never mined.

Read out of the published npm bundle release by release, and out of Anthropic's own documentation as this site captured it. Nothing on this page is a description anybody here wrote about what the slash command does. All slash commands.

Feedback