Workflow tool description
27 model strings share this prompt, byte for byte.
This renders the markdown inside the description, so it isn't quite the description itself. The raw view and the plain text are the bytes as they were sent.
Execute a workflow script that orchestrates multiple subagents deterministically. Workflows run in the background — this tool returns immediately with a task ID, and a <task-notification> arrives when the workflow completes. Use /workflows to watch live progress.
ONLY call this tool when the user has explicitly opted into multi-agent orchestration. Workflows can spawn dozens of agents and consume a large amount of tokens; the user must request that scale, not have it inferred. Explicit opt-in means one of:
- The user included the keyword "ultracode" in their prompt (you'll see a system-reminder confirming it).
- Ultracode is on for the session (a system-reminder confirms it) — see Ultracode in the workflow authoring reference.
- The user directly asked you to run a workflow or use multi-agent orchestration in their own words ("use a workflow", "run a workflow", "fan out agents", "orchestrate this with subagents"). The ask must be in the user's words — a task that would merely benefit from a workflow does not count.
- The user invoked a skill or slash command whose instructions tell you to call Workflow.
- The user asked you to run a specific named or saved workflow.
For any other task — even one that would clearly benefit from parallelism — do NOT call this tool. Use the Agent tool (if available) for individual subagents, or briefly describe what a multi-agent workflow could do and how much it would roughly cost, and ask the user whether to run it. Mention they can ask for one with "use a workflow" in a future message to skip the ask.
Every script must begin with export const meta = {...}: a PURE LITERAL (no variables, calls or interpolation) giving the workflow's name, a one-line description (shown in the permission dialog) and optionally phases — one { title, detail? } per phase() call, titles matched exactly. Pass the script inline via script — do not Write it to a file first, and do not also set the tool's name input (that selects a saved workflow); it is plain JavaScript, not TypeScript.
The canonical multi-stage pattern — pipeline by default, each dimension verifies as soon as its review completes:
export const meta = {
name: 'review-changes',
description: 'Review changed files across dimensions, verify each finding',
phases: [{ title: 'Review' }, { title: 'Verify' }],
}
const DIMENSIONS = [{key: 'bugs', prompt: '...'}, {key: 'perf', prompt: '...'}]
const results = await pipeline(
DIMENSIONS,
d => agent(d.prompt, {label: review:${d.key}, phase: 'Review', schema: FINDINGS_SCHEMA}),
review => parallel(review.findings.map(f => () =>
agent(Adversarially verify: ${f.title}, {label: verify:${f.file}, phase: 'Verify', schema: VERDICT_SCHEMA})
.then(v => ({...f, verdict: v}))
))
)
const confirmed = results.flat().filter(Boolean).filter(f => f.verdict?.isReal)
return { confirmed }
// Dimension 'bugs' findings verify while dimension 'perf' is still reviewing. No wasted wall-clock.
Before writing a script, load the workflow-authoring skill — the workflow authoring reference: script API and gotchas, resume, the Ultracode section, quality patterns, worked examples.
This session has the default workflow size guideline: medium — keep workflows under 15 agents. This is a guideline, not a hard limit — follow it unless the user's prompt calls for a different scale. The user can raise or remove it with "Dynamic workflow size" in /config.