Follow Discord
Sweep 22 Oct 2026 · 04:32Z Build v2.1.308 527 read Stable v2.1.308 Latest v2.1.308 Next v2.1.308 Feeds RSS JSON llms.txt llms-full.txt Unofficial
One change · api

Create the full URL from the GitHub repository changedabout-claude/use-case-guides/legal-summarization

Nearest release: v2.1.299, published an hour after this site recorded the change. Shown because the two are within 24 hours of each other. Nothing here says the release caused the edit.

Recorded here
Lines+10added
Lines−16removed
From line 89 where the diff opens
First seen 14 Aug 2026 this site's first read of the page
Recorded edits9to this page, all time

The whole hunk

from line 89, old and new numbered
/
lines
from line 89
8989 
9090### Select the right Claude model
9191 
92Model accuracy is extremely important when summarizing legal documents. Claude Opus 5 is an excellent choice for use cases such as this where high accuracy is required. If the size and quantity of your documents is large such that costs start to become a concern, you can also try using a smaller model such as Claude Haiku 5.5.
92Model accuracy is extremely important when summarizing legal documents. Claude Opus 5.5 is an excellent choice for use cases such as this where high accuracy is required. If the size and quantity of your documents is large such that costs start to become a concern, you can also try using a smaller model such as Claude Haiku 5.5.
9393 
9494To help estimate these costs, the following is a comparison of the cost to summarize 1,000 sublease agreements using Opus and Haiku models:
9595 
from line 101
101101 
102102* **Estimated tokens**
103103 
104 * Input tokens: 108M, about 108,000 per agreement (about 1 token per 2.8 characters, the rate all three models showed on this guide's sample agreement)
105 * Output tokens per summary, including any thinking tokens, which are billed as output: about 4,800 on Claude Opus 5, 2,000 on Claude Opus 4.8, and 3,100 on Claude Haiku 5.5
106 * Total output tokens: 4.8M on Claude Opus 5, 2.0M on Claude Opus 4.8, and 3.1M on Claude Haiku 5.5
104 * Input tokens: 108M, about 108,000 per agreement (about 1 token per 2.8 characters, the rate both models showed on this guide's sample agreement)
105 * Output tokens per summary, including any thinking tokens, which are billed as output: about 6,200 on Claude Opus 5.5 and 3,100 on Claude Haiku 5.5
106 * Total output tokens: 6.2M on Claude Opus 5.5 and 3.1M on Claude Haiku 5.5
107107 
108* **Claude Opus 5 estimated cost**
108* **Claude Opus 5.5 estimated cost**
109109 
110 * Input token cost: 108 MTok \* $5.00/MTok = $540.00 USD
111 * Output token cost: 4.8 MTok \* $25.00/MTok = $120.00 USD
112 * Total cost: $540.00 + $120.00 = $660.00 USD
113 
114* **Claude Opus 4.8 estimated cost**
115 
116 * Input token cost: 108 MTok \* $5.00/MTok = $540.00 USD
117 * Output token cost: 2.0 MTok \* $25.00/MTok = $50.00 USD
118 * Total cost: $540.00 + $50.00 = $590.00 USD
110 * Input token cost: 108 MTok \* $4.00/MTok = $432.00 USD
111 * Output token cost: 6.2 MTok \* $20.00/MTok = $124.00 USD
112 * Total cost: $432.00 + $124.00 = $556.00 USD
119113 
120114* **Claude Haiku 5.5 estimated cost**, at its prices for prompts over 100,000 tokens
121115 
Feedback