{"version":"2.1.318","anchor":"tengu-dapper-acorn-gate-now-also-excludes-some-condition","canonical_anchor":"tengu-dapper-acorn-gate-now-also-excludes-some-condition","heading":"The unnamed HIPAA-excluded remote switch now has one more exclusion","tier":"soon","area":"Internals","scope":"org","heads_up":false,"url":"https:\/\/changelogs.core-directive.com\/v\/2.1.318\/e\/tengu-dapper-acorn-gate-now-also-excludes-some-condition","release_url":"https:\/\/changelogs.core-directive.com\/v\/2.1.318","markdown":"### The unnamed HIPAA-excluded remote switch now has one more exclusion\n\nA remote switch that already skipped HIPAA organisations is now also skipped under one more condition\n\n**What**\n\nA remotely controlled switch that already did not apply to organisations under the HIPAA policy is now also turned off under one more condition. Before, that slot in the check always passed. The switch is still off unless it is switched on remotely, and what it controls still cannot be seen.\n\n**Why**\n\nThe feature behind it is now held back in one more situation.\n\n- Flag `tengu_dapper_acorn`: Not enough to say (read for one account on one subscription tier against v2.1.318; this account: no value returned, anonymous baseline: no value returned, compiled default: off) These values were read against a different version of Claude Code, so treat them as the nearest reading available instead of one taken on this release.\n- Area: Internals\n- Tier: Nothing to try yet\n- Useful: 1\/5\n- Signal: 2\/5\n- Scope: org\n- Heads-up: no\n- Present in the build but not switched on"}