{"version":"2.1.277","anchor":"policy-limits-client-lazily-composed-at-startup-behind-an-u","canonical_anchor":"policy-limits-client-lazily-composed-at-startup-behind-an-u","heading":"Policy-limits client lazily composed at startup, behind an unresolved gate F()","tier":"soon","area":"Policy Limits","scope":null,"heads_up":null,"url":"https:\/\/changelogs.core-directive.com\/v\/2.1.277\/e\/policy-limits-client-lazily-composed-at-startup-behind-an-u","release_url":"https:\/\/changelogs.core-directive.com\/v\/2.1.277","markdown":"### Policy-limits client lazily composed at startup, behind an unresolved gate F()\n\nPolicy limits client for the agents view is now lazily loaded at startup behind an internal gate\n\n**Unclear.** What the internal gate condition and `catalogDecision` setting actually control is not established by the evidence.\n\n**What**\n\nA new startup routine checks a catalog decision setting, and if it isn't already set, dynamically loads a policy-limits client module for the agents view. It only actually composes the client when an internal condition is true and a `storageV5` option is present; failures are caught and logged as a warning rather than crashing. It always waits for a \"cold start\" step to finish before continuing.\n\n**Why**\n\nThis defers loading policy-limits code until it's needed and guards startup against failures in that composition step, so a problem there produces a warning instead of breaking the agents view.\n\n- Area: Policy Limits\n- Tier: Nothing to try yet\n- Useful: 2\/5\n- Signal: 3\/5\n- Present in the build but not switched on"}